THE VALUE OF THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND LITERATURE REVIEW TOWARDS A QUALITY RESEARCH WORK
Abstract
The theoretical framework and literature review are crucial aspects of research process, yet it is usually misunderstood by researchers as they prepare their research reports. This study accentuated the importance of theory-driven procedures concerning the selection of a topic, the development of research questions, the conceptualization of the literature review, the planning approach, and the analysis plan for research. This study used an integrative approach and different methodologies were combined to review the literature and summarise it for a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomena. The review of the literature revealed that trying to make use of theory while developing a theoretical framework under time pressure may appear to be a rather agonizing experience. As such, the challenging journey of creating sense of theory and developing a theoretical framework within a decent timeframe might be considered the rigour in research study. A researcher would be able to better empathize with the struggles and potential frustrations of researches with a full grasp of a theoretical framework that matches his/her research works through the review of the literature. The study gained insights into the previous study through the review of the literature and made useful suggestions on the benefits of theoretical framework and literature review that will allow scholar researches to make sense and enable them come out with quality works.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anfara. V.A. and Mertz. N. T. (2015) Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research.
Sage, United Kingdom
. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful
literature review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Broido, E. M., & Manning, K. (2002). Philosophical foundations and current theoretical
perspectives in qualitative research. Journal of College Student Development, 43(4),
–445.
Burri, M. (2017). Making Sense of Theory: A Doctoral Student's Narrative of
Conceptualizing a Theoretical Framework. BC Teal Journal, 2 (1), 25-35.
Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach
(4th.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what
constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12-32.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approaches, 5th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2018) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approach. 5th ed; Los Angeles: Sage,
Denyer, D., & Pilbeam, C. (2013). Doing a literature review in business and
management. Presentation to the British Academy of Management Doctora
Symposiu in Liverpool, UK.
Efron. S.E. and Ravid. R. (2019) Writing the literature review: a practical guide.
Fink, A. (2014)6Conducting research literature reviews: from the internet to paper. The
Langley Research Institute. 4th ed. Los Angele, Sage
Grant. C. and Osanloo .A. (2014) Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical
framework in dissertation research: creating the blueprint for your house. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice and Research. Doi: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9
Issa A.O (2012) Guide to project writing for student in Polytechnics, Colleges and universities. Offa: Wumi Commercial Press.
Issa, A.O (2003) ‘’Research project and library Research ‘’ In Kolawole, A.A and A.O Issa. Library and Information Science: An Introduction Text. Offa: Dee Root. PP 72-88.
Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36, 139-147.
Lovitts, B. (2005). How to grade the dissertation? Academics, 91(6), 18-23.
Lukenchuk, A. (Ed.). (2013). Paradigms of research for the 21st century: Perspectives
and examples from practice. New York: Peter Lang.
Lysaght, Z. (2011). Epistemological and paradigmatic ecumenism in Pasteur’s Quadrant:
Tales from doctoral research. Official Conference Proceedings of the Third Asian
Conference on Education in Osaka, Japan. Retrieved from http://iafor.org/ace2011_offprint/ACE2011_offprint_0254.pdf.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating
diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Nord. J.H., Koohang. A., Paliszkiewicz. J. (2019) The Internet of Things: Review and
theoretical framework. Expert Systems with Applications 133. 97–108
Opeke, R. (1995) ‘The Workshop on technical writing and Reporting skills for library and Information Professionals. Held at the SS Peter and Paul Seminary, Bodija, Ibadan.
-22 Nov.
Osuala, E.C. (1993) Introduction to research Methodology Benin city; Ilupeju Press Ltd.
Papineau, D. (1979). Theory and meaning. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
Snyder. H. (2019) Literature Review as a research methodology: An overview and
guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104 (2019) 333–339
Tie. Y.C, Birks.M and Francis. K. (2019) Grounded theory research: A design
framework for novice researchers. Sage Open Medicine. Volume 7: 1–8
Whittemore, R., and K. Knafl. (2005). The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology.
Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 (5): 546–553.
Wilkins, S., Neri, S., & Lean, J. (2019). The role of theory in the business/management
PhD: How students may use theory to make an original contribution to knowledge. The
International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100316.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 3026-9474 (Online)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.