THE IMPACT AND EFFECTS OF THE ABOLITION OF THE U.N.O. SECURITY COUNCIL ON WORLD PEACE: A CASE FOR DEMOCRATIZATION OF ITS MEMBERSHIP
Abstract
For seventy years of its existence and for fifty years of its last expansion with the increase of non permanent members the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has remained unchanged. Five permanent members made up of USA, Russia, France, Britain and China have by their status been responsible for dictating and influencing the course of outcomes in international affairs and diplomacy. The world is dynamic and never constant, hence the current debate that this structural arrangement no longer represent the reality of the world order, and hence the clamour for its abolition. This call if adhered to portends enormous consequences for world peace which will be catastrophic. This study admits the unrealistic nature of the present day security council but opposes its abolition as the impact and effect shall not be in the interest of the world. Instead, it is the recommendation of this study that the membership of the UN security council should be democratized so that every continent will have at least, a representative.
Keywords
References
Benneth L.A. (1996) International Organizations, New Jersey, Prentice Inc Englewood Cliffs.
Eghosa, E.S. (1998) Crippled Giant: Nigeria Since Independence, London, C. Hist and Co. Publishers Ltd.
Giovani Finizio, “The Democratization of the United Nations”, http.//www.academia.edu/3863070
McDonald K.C. and S.M. Patrick (2014) “UN Security Council Enlargement and USS Interest” www.cfr.org//unsc.csr59.pdf
Ogwu U.J. (2005 ed), New Horizons for Nigeria In World Affairs, Lagos, NIIA.
Worldmark Encyclopedia of the United Nations, 1971, New York, Worldmark Press Ltd.
Ziring L. et. al (2000) The United Nations International Organization and World Politics, Crawfordsille, Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.