EFFECT OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION PRACTICE ON GIRL CHILD EDUCATION: SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPLICATION IN SOUTH EAST NIGERIA.
Abstract
this study investigated the effect of female genital mutilation practice on child girl education in the south east Nigeria. Three research questions and two hypotheses guided the study. The population of the study comprised all the mutilated female with south east. A sample of 1000 respondents was purposively drawn at 200 per a state. Four points modified likert type questionnaire, made up of 24 items was used. The instrument was duly validated by three experts. Data collected were analysed with mean, standard deviation and it test statistics. The result should that FGM has negative effects on girl child education, social and economic status of south east Nigeria. Recommendation made include:
- a. Governments in south east Nigeria should implement their various policies and FGM prohibition laws and punish offenders.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asha. M, Nancy, A. and Nancy Y. (2000) programme for appropriate technology in Health, WHO fact sheet.
Badejo O.A (2001) complications of circumcision: The Ife experiences, Nigeria med. Practice 5:103-9.
Berg R.C.V.U. and Odgaard Jensen J.(2014), Effect of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: “A Systematic Review and Met analysis” BMJ open 4 e006316.doi:10.1136/bmj open.
Bond A. and Okeke T. (2012) an overview of female genital mutilation in Nigeria, https//Www. Research gate. Net/publication/233841130.
Chibber R., Saleh. E.E and Harm J E (2011) female circumcision: obstetrical and psychological sequel continues unabated in the 21st century. Journal of maternal fatal and Neonatal medicine vol. 24 no 16 pp833-836.
Elliot K, Elizabeth H, Michelle S. Kohloff S. and Tamar AS. N. (2018) female genital mutilation: health consequences and complications- obstetrics and gynaecology international vol., Article ID 7365715.
Elnashar A. and Abdelhady R. (2007). The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics 97:238-42.
Gryenbaum .D (2001) female circumcision controversy: An anthropological perspective, phi lade, Phia University of pennsywania press p.242.
Kissaakye G. (2002), women, culture and human rights: female genital mutilation, New York, Zed Books.
Nwajei S.D. and Otiono. A.I. (2003) FGM: implication for female sexuality, women studies international forum 26:575-80.
Offor M.O. and Ofole N.M. (2015) FGM: The place of culture and the debilitating effects on the dignity of the female gender, European scientific Journal vol. II p. 112-121.
Odukogbe A.A, Afolabi B.B and Adeyanju A.S. (2017) FGM/cutting in Africa, translational Anthology and Urology vol.6 No 2 pp. 138-148.
Okonofu F.E. (2002), association between FGM cutting and correlates of sexual and gynaecological morbidity in Edo state Nigeria, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 109: 1089-96.
Quedraogo S. (2008) social effect and female genital mutilation https//mpra.Ub.Uni-muenchen.de //17847//.
Sergent F. (2001) confronting patriarchy: The potential for advocacy in medical anthropology. Medical anthropology quarterly journal No 5 p24-25.
Samuel K. (2016) FGM/cutting Nairobi, university of Nairobi press.
WHO (2020) female genital mutilation.
WHO (2016) female genital mutilation https//www.who.int/media centre/factsheets/fs241/en/.
WHO (2006) FGM and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative perspective, study in 6 African countries. The lancet 367(9525) 1835-1841.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.