ACCOUNTING AND CONSTRUCTIONISM: THE SUBTLE ART OF MANIPULATING VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Abstract
This conceptual paper examined Accounting constructionism and the manipulation of figures through falsification of the facts usually presented in some financial reports and statements. The main objective of this study is to discuss the impact of accounting constructionism on the voluntary disclosures in financial reports. The study sought to promote the need for Accountants to take advantage of the dignified position of informing the users of accounts and the society at large of useful information that will trigger a well informed decision about the happenings in a business organization. The qualitative research methods was used. It was found that the position for a socially constructed accounting presentation based on their opinion that accounting does not present reality but constructs reality as majority of the researchers opines that accountants usually perceive themselves as though involved in an objective, independent opinion, unbiased disposition, but in reality they are subjective “constructors of reality”. Presenting circumstances in limited and biased views in some cases. In conclusion, the notion of a true and fair view of information as shown in a financial statement is developed by the accountant and introduced to the users of the information. If this reality fails to expose the true condition of an entity, there is sure to be manipulation of facts which has an unfavorable repercussion on the company, public and other users of the information. Hence in such a situation, the accountant would be said to be a constructor of reality. The paper recommended that the accountant’s duty in constructing reality has a formidable impact and effects in the organization and community at large. It therefore should be upheld with utmost objectivity, integrity and transparency to enable the various stakeholders depending on the financial information to be guided properly.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Accounting and its Role in Society (2018). Retrieved from https://toughnickel.com/ industries/Accounting-and.its-role-in-society.
Alexander, D., & Archer, S. (2003). On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the ‘true and fair override’. Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 3-17.
Baker, S. (2002). Laddering: Making sense of meaning. Essential skills for management research, 226-253. London: Sage.
Bannister, D., & Fransella, F. (1971). Inquiring Man: The Theory of Personal Constructs. London: Penguin.
Bannister, D. (1968). The Theory of Personal Constructs. Penguin Books.
Elkhashen, E., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Accounting and philosophy: The construction of social reality framework. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, Forthcoming.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in sociology of knowledge (1st ed.) Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110-122). Routledge.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., Jackson, P., & Lowe, A. (2008). Management research: theory and practice. Sage Publications Ltd., London, UK, 101, 210.
Kelly, G. (1955). Personal construct psychology. Nueva York: Norton.
Goffin, K. (2002). Repertory grid technique. In essential skills for management research (pp.199-225). London:Sage.
Goffin, K., Lemke, F., Koners, U., Goffin, K., Lemke, F., & Koners, U. (2010). Repertory grid technique. Identifying Hidden Needs: Creating Breakthrough Products, 125-152.
Hibberd, F.J. (2014). A juggernaut in the philosophy of psychology: Reply to Martin, Gergen and Held. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 34 (3):205-210
Hines, R. (1998). Financial Accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), pp.251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00061-7
Hines, T., McBride, K., Fearnley, S., & Brandt, R. (2001). We’re off to see the wizard: an evaluation of directors’ and auditors’ experiences with the financial reporting review panel. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(1), 53-84.
Iwedi, M. (2017). Bank failure in Nigeria: Evidence of prudential regulator laxity. Frontiers in Management Research, 1(4), 141-150.
Jenkins, A. H. (2001). Individuality in cultural context: The case for psychological agency. Theory & Psychology, 11(3), 347-362.
Lukka, K. (2010). The roles and effects of paradigms in Accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 110-115.
Maali, B.M., & Jaara, O.O. (2014). Reality and Accounting: The case for interpretive accounting research. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(1), 155-168.
Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, organizations and society, 13(5), 477-485.
Ragsdell, G., West, D., & Wilby, J. (Eds.). (2002). Systems theory and practice in the knowledge age. Springer Science & Business Media.
Rogers, B., & Ryals, L. (2007). Using the repertory grid to access the underlying realities in key account relationships. International Journal of Market Research, 49(5), 595-612.
Rudes, J., & Guterman, J. T. (2007). The value of social constructionism for the counseling profession: A reply to Hansen. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85(4), 387-392.
Sahara reporters (2010) retrived from https://saharareporters.com
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Simon and Schuster.
Shapiro, B. P. (1997). Objectivity, relativism, and truth in external financial reporting: What's really at stake in the disputes? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 165-185.
Stewarts & Mayes (2002). Enquire within. Wellington, New Zealand: Enquire within Developments Ltd. European Journal of Business and Management.
Sundgren, S. (2013). Is fair value accounting really fair? A discussion of pros and cons with fair value measurement. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 62(3-4), 242-250.
Tinker, A. M., Merino, B. D., & Neimark, M. D. (1982). The normative origins of positive theories: ideology and accounting thought. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(2), 167-200.
Trivedi, C. (2020) Social Construction Simplified! Concepts Hacked. https://conceptshacked.com/social-construction.
Wachira, M. (2018). Constructionism in Accounting Research: An Investigative Tool for Corporate Social Disclosure Practices.
Watts, R.L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: a ten-year perspective. Accounting Review, 131-156
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.